• 10 Posts
  • 254 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2020

help-circle
  • I guess, it can select the wrong song, if:

    • the correct song doesn’t have its acoustic fingerprint in the MusicBrainz database (otherwise it would be the closest match), and
    • another song has a similar enough acoustic fingerprint, above a threshold that you can configure in the Picard settings.

    I assume, it has to be a threshold, because you might have slight variations for the same song/recording, like silence at the end trimmed or volume normalized or whatever.

    And yeah, Picard’s UI is certainly a bit of a hurdle. Conveying information for so many changes is definitely not easy, so I don’t want to complain.
    But you know, if it would have detected that some of my songs will get renamed not just with a few capitalization fixes, but rather completely different words, and it would have prompted me for those, then I wouldn’t have misnamed songs now…


  • Yeah, at some point, I told Picard to just re-sort everything and that was not a good idea. Some songs got renamed or put under a different artist, because I guess, the actual song is not in the MusicBrainz database.
    I do have a backup that I should restore actually, but yeah, difficult to notice such changes and especially to know how much damage was done.

    I did also figure, I should just add the unknown songs into MusicBrainz, but boy, I added one album and that took more than half an hour…

    Definitely leaning more and more towards that unsorted life…



  • I mean, increasing that timeout doesn’t really sound like it resumes the download, but rather that it never properly cancels it. I don’t think, Firefox would want to implement that, as it’s somewhat bad etiquette for a client to keep a connection open for a long time.

    My understanding is that actually resuming partial downloads is generally badly supported by server software and that’s why support for it is not implemented in Firefox.







  • Well, they would typically have a system prompt (like an invisible chat message that’s sent to the LLM at the start of the conversation), where it would tell the LLM something like “You’re a helpful chatbot. Talk cheerfully and use 🩵 all the time.”

    And in that system prompt, you can also give it instructions to only answer certain questions. But it really is like a chat message, in that it just as well might ignore those instructions when another chat message asks it to.

    OP chose the formulation “Before I subscribe to a creator, …” which might be necessary here to get it to answer, as it might have been told to only help with creator subscriptions, but then the formulation implies that by answering this question, it is helping the user to subscribe. That’s called a prompt injection.

    If you can find a prompt injection, then yes, you can do this with any chatbot.
    Although they might still not be as useful as a dedicated tool, since they likely can’t do tool calls, like web searches or running the compiler.



  • Yeah, not a bad stance to have. When I switched to Linux (in the middle of a compsci minor), I thought I was the king of the world and that I knew everything about computers.

    Then Linux showed me that I know fuckall, not because it was particularly hard, but rather because it’s an open library.
    You can look at a random config file on your PC and it will explain you highly technical concepts for free.
    You can look at the source code of anything you’re interested in. Well, or probably rather read an explainer from someone who read/wrote the source code.
    And you can easily look at the logs of your applications to debug them.

    Every so often, I run into folks that genuinely seem to know a lot about Windows, and I always wonder how. It doesn’t explain anything to you. 😅








  • Ephera@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Quality Software
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Anyone using the national domain registrar? Does it only resolve nationally, if you buy from there, as the article implies…?

    But you want your domain over the world. Cool, do you have enough clients to need this? Then you can hire a person in each country to buy you a domain from the local registry.

    I’ve been interested in getting a domain name, but it always just felt like a scam to pay a monthly fee for an entry in a database. If the national registrar is good enough, that would be cool.

    Although, I guess, if it is not, I’d at least still be somewhat more at peace with that, since it would mean the intermediate company actually does something…