Just ask chatgpt to do that.

That is exactly what I thought, I’m so confused.

If nothing else, it’s “look at all these people using our services, that’s proof we’re awesome, even on the free tier, so imagine what you’ll get if you pay us!” ¯\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

Yep, good thing none of us has done that.

Yeah, I read that. I still reserve the right to reject your analogy because I don’t accept it as relevant or analogue to anything. You can’t go “don’t say these things that disagree with me” and expect me to shrug my shoulders and go along.

I mean, your analogies that fall apart at the premise don’t really help.

Yeah, that’s one way to (not) answer.

You start that “analogy” with the binary assumption. That’s where it falls apart.

Yeah. So “nearby structures” determine sex, not “size of gametes”. What are they nearby? Possibly nothing.

You’d THINK capitalism would cause that to happen, wouldn’t you?

So sex is determined by what structures medical professionals expect to be there.

Cool, you’re only now even contemplating what I’ve been talking about for several posts. Ovarian agenesis, Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, anorchia.

The spherical cow does exist though, it’s in the teeny tiny slivers in the OP’s post.

So it’s not the size of gametes but some secondary structures vaguely involved in the development of structures that are involved in the production of gametes. Did I get that right?

There’s nothing about the production of gametes in there.

Let me rephrase that: people without ovaries, uterus, vagina or testes. Nowhere in their bodies. They have a vulva or a penis plus scrotum.

No that’s not what I mean. People can be born without ovaries, uterus, vagina (but have a vulva). People can also be born without testes (but have a scrotum and penis). They do not possess these organs, they are nowhere in their bodies. That’s what I was talking about in the very beginning.

Are you then going to answer my question and tell me what size gamete a body without either ovaries, uterus, and vagina, but a vulva, is “organised” around? Or are you going to shift the goalposts further? First it was “size of gametes”, now its “organised around a size” and I still don’t know what that even means.

It seems like it.

So why’re you trying to put it into such a rigid framework if you agree it’s messy?