sushi

“published” means a very specific thing in academic circles. a paper has to go through peer review to be published.

There are two Microsoft Outlooks inside you.

Edit: so the bluesky post wasn’t accurate. The fake papers were never published, they were pre-prints, and were written to be obviously fake if you paid any attention to read it. LLM didn’t have the ability to tell, some researchers took LLM’s output and didn’t check the source material.

Don’t know what to say. Also kinda ironic this bluesky user apparently didn’t know the difference between a preprint and a published paper either.

Original post:

(I’ve only read the title. If turns out I am terribly mistaken I will come back and correct myself). More like scientists commit academic fraud and fooled a bunch of people. How did this get through the ethics board? Why would any publisher play along with this?

how so?

yeah the age thing just makes you one to two years older for no reason. it’s not nice when you are old :(

incenses in a 王老吉 can?!?

Oof that sounds expensive…

Look at that. This is what a good leader can do.

Size doesn’t matter

If a flat disc has no holes, how many holes does the surface of a sphere have?

are we that good at going from fundamental laws to what actually will happen in the macro world? e.g. we can’t even figure out why certain materials are superconductive at high temperatures.

so i doubt the counterfactual presented in this graph is accurate. we just know if the coupling constant is different the universe will look completely different, but we would have no idea if intelligent life could still arise.

hmm, how about 12 months each with 30 days, plus 5 days every year that’s not part of any month?

It’s not your fault. Don’t hate yourself and don’t give yourself pressure. Relax and maybe it will happen, or maybe it won’t. Either way, don’t push yourself.

oh my god

our org forbids plain http

is redirecting http to https also out of the question? because let’s encrypt HTTP-01 accepts http -> https redirects:

Our implementation of the HTTP-01 challenge follows redirects, up to 10 redirects deep. It only accepts redirects to “http:” or “https:”, and only to ports 80 or 443. It does not accept redirects to IP addresses. When redirected to an HTTPS URL, it does not validate certificates.

Half a dozen sounds like a lot, kinda curious what you are running? If they all are web services maybe use a reverse proxy or something?

Depends on which DNS service you are using, a plugin might already exist that would do it for you. e.g. I use cloudflare for DNS and certbot is able to automatically set the txt record.

Well it should be as short as possible while still being practical. LE doesn’t have infinite server compute, renewal also takes some amount of time, plus if they make the validity too short people might stop using them (pretty evident judging from sentiment here) and move to other CAs and make what they do pointless.

45 days are still plenty of time yet people are already complaining. Does make me worry.

You can already get 6-day certificates if you want to https://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/16/6-day-and-ip-certs