• expr@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I assume you’re just saying that’s what they think? Because that’s very, very far from reality.

    • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I understand the reality of it, and yes that is their thought process. I don’t believe that coding will stay the same, however there needs to be thought put into it by a human.

      I think, eventually, there has to be a certain level of automation or standardization of structural components of code that can be written by AI. But the point is not to replace all coding, but rather, AI being a tool to be used in a specific, and controlled method.

      • kibblebits@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        A problem with all the corporations is they aren’t developers, and they don’t know AI is just another tool. It was sold as a solution to a problem they didn’t know they had until it was marketed to them as a problem.

        • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          It’s being used as a scapegoat to fire expensive labor and replace it with cheap international labor under the guise of AI. They overhired and are changing from social media to social control, as designed by the government.

          • kibblebits@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            Well, international labor is apparently driving Waymo “self driving” cars instead of AI, so you might not be too far off ;)