This is the damning fact:

Epidemiologist Michael Baker told Stuff it was difficult to properly monitor influenza and other winter illnesses, because high-quality surveillance programmes were discontinued, including the Ministry of Health not renewing its contract for the FluTracking tool for cost-saving reasons.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It costs about $20 to get it from my local pharmacy. There are about five million people.

    Let’s assume that the government/pharmac/healthnz/whomever could source five million doses at a good rate and fund the staffing requirements to administer them. Say that is the same $20/dose cost.

    $100m or about ten metres of motorway.

    The best part is you don’t need to do all five million, I think about 80% is enough for herd immunity to take effect. So it’s cheaper at $80m.

    'flu takes about a week to recover from. So every person that gets it ‘costs’ their employer a week’s wages. Call that $25/hr × 40hr = $1000/wk. We’d only need to stop 80,000 people from getting 'flu each year to break even. NZ had almost half a million cases in 2025.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It seems that the math, maths quite well here.

      Hospital stays are a big expense.

      For context, 3 out of 5 of my family got the flu this year. One ended up in hospital for 2 nights.

      Preventing 1000 hospital nights had to be worth quite a lot also.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Indeed it would, I wasn’t sure how the numbers would work out.

        Just the sick day cost is what you’d need to convince your local National/Act/NZF incumbent.