• stib@aus.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    @FreedomAdvocate
    Sorry, can you point out the part of the article where it says that ‘there will be “less workers to build houses” lol’. Your reading comprehension is as bad as your grasp of economics. Yes wages would be higher but inflation would negate any benefits to the workers.
    Your claim that migrants worsen the housing crisis is not based on evidence, because the actual evidence says the opposite is true. And given the way you double down in spite of that seems a lot like it’s a made-up justification for your xenophobia. Walks like a bigot, quacks like a bigot.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      can you point out the part of the article

      Sure, right here:

      That’s because, Rynne says, the lower demand for housing is overwhelmed by the drop in the number of workers available to build homes.

      I honestly dont understand how anyone can deny that increasing demand without accordingly increasing supply, which we factually are not, hurts availability and affordability. Like, this is supply and demand 101. It’s one of the most basic concepts in business, and the entire world.

      Keep throwing around insults because you can’t actually have a good discussion, it definitely makes you look smart.

      • stib@aus.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        @FreedomAdvocate
        So somehow you believe the bit where decreased supply in the labour market leads to higher wages, but not that it means that there is a, you know, decrease in the number of workers? Much smart, very genius.
        Tell me more about your economics insights that show their modeling is wrong. We all stand to learn here, given that your PhD obviously comes from the University of Vibes, Man.