• Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The very point of the removal of protection is as an attack on trans women. So unless you were suggesting an impact on cis women too, I don’t understand why you would add “and women” when they were already at the centre of the discussion.

      Your current wording implies that the term trans folk does not include women.

        • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The wording is important.

          The conversation was about trans women already. If your point is that it impacts not only trans women, but all women, then say that! Don’t frame it as if women and trans people are non overlapping groups.