Context: He’s in the files

  • mirshafie@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 days ago

    Likely lots of people who had contact with Epstein did nothing wrong, at least not on that level.

    He was collecting powerful people, in science, business, government, anything. One way to do that is to offer access to other important people. The ability to say to someone “I can connect you with Stephen Hawking” is currency.

    The pedophilia ring and sex trafficking is the exact same thing – just a way to appeal to certain people.

    I think it’s more interesting to talk about who the fuck gave Epstein a private island in one of the most stupidly expensive spits of sand on the entire planet. Likely the same people who killed him.

    • Soulcreator@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not like Hawking and Epstein traded a few emails talking about science, or had a one off meeting. It appears they had a fair amount of exchanges over a long period of time.

      Epstein was a vile human in the worst kind of way and I see no evidence that Hawking was blind to this fact. Half the people on this app wouldn’t willingly associate with someone of a different political party than them, but to defend a man who willingly spent time with a convicted sex trafficker? The fact that Hawking was paralyzed doesn’t absolve him from willingly enabling (and potentially partaking in) child abuse and sex trafficking.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I know one person IRL who was a frequenter of Little St John Island, aka Epstein Island. Wealthy man who made that trip regularly. He was not particularly attractive but he was wealthy. This is the place old wealthy men would go to get sexual satisfaction when nobody else will give it to them.

        • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          He’s not famous. He’s a very private person. Naming him would do no good. It would be like naming your next door neighbor. Nobody knows him.

          • itistime@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Naming him would do no good.

            That is not true. There is no accountability if people keep protecting them. Leak his name. It will help current investigators. It will help future prosecutors. If you don’t do it here or elsewhere, then YOU are not better than him.

            • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you don’t do it here or elsewhere, then YOU are not better than him.

              🙄

              He’s my friend. I’m not going to doxx him on the internet under the meaningless pressure of some Lemmy stranger. He & I spent a whole year together having fun & biking & yoga & paddle boarding & swimming. The moment you begin to mean more to me than he does, then we’ll talk.

              • itistime@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                How is your behavior any different than the multitude in power and authority who turned a blind eye? Have you considered the life of those he abused? Have you considered the moral battle that is happening?

                The moment you begin to mean more to me than he does, then we’ll talk.

                Decency and a will against abject evil should be all that it takes to do the right thing. You don’t want to leak here? Fine. ProPublica.