• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Fusion(…) pose security risks

    Wait, what kind? Doesn’t the reaction just fizzle out and become safely dormant if anything wrong happens?

        • atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          For example when Russia invaded Ukraine and they attacked Chernobyl. Maybe it’s not founded in real risk. But I imagine it could be a security threat for someone to bomb a nuclear facility.

          • Techlos@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            To alleviate your concerns - unlike fission, in a fusion reactor the only radiation comes from the active fusion process, and chamber lining that’s been bombarded by radiation. The worst case is a brief spike of neutron and gamma radiation from where the chamber breaches before the plasma collapses, a small amount of short-lived radioisotopes from the chamber debris, and a bit of tritium.

            The radiation from the debris would be at background levels in a year or two, since there’s no transuranic decay chains (once decay event, and it’s stable again). The tritium would disperse to background levels in minutes, and the radiation burst would only be a hazard in the immediate vicinity.

            Not free from issues at all, but compared to a fission reactor the worst-case scenario isn’t bad at all.

            • atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              Great, and I also hear that the amount of nuclear waste is tiny in comparison to contemporary nuclear reactors.