• Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Completely expected that teens closer to 16 would be able to bypass it. Same thing happens with alcohol and people almost of age. But I expect younger children cannot bypass so easily so it’s still a net positive.

    IMO the more productive solution is to restrict cellphone use during school. They’ve recently done that in my area and both students and faculty have positive responses.

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s not a solution to this problem, though. It’s definitely an important change for the quality of education, but if kids still have unlimited access to their phones between ~3 PM and whenever they fall asleep + unlimited access on Saturdays and Sundays then it’s not doing much to rewire their brains or keep them safe.

      • itsathursday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        If only they had adults that were guarding them in some legal capacity to avoid this behaviour or something

        • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          Having a law the adults can point to helps them enforce boundaries. That’s what the social media ban was meant to be about