• TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wouldn’t a bunch of smaller diesel attack subs be a better tool for controlling our coasts and northern waters?

    • skribe@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We deploy our subs for blue water not just littoral use. They patrol up as far as the South China Sea. Nukes allow us the stay on station for much longer than DEs.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The South China Sea is shallow, a poor operating environment for nuclear subs.

        Containment of China to the South China Sea is a US strategy and one which Australia is subsiding, while materially hurting its ability to defend Australia’s coastline.

        • skribe@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          A nuke sub operating there for a couple of months is still better than a DE that leaves after a week (presuming it can reach that far at all).

          • Deanosity@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            China can already detect all subs in the South China Sea between their network of underwater sensors and synthetic aperture radar satellites.