• AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    Dude the flat earth people sent one of their leaders up into low orbit. When he came back and said the earth is round cuz he saw it, instead of believing him they just kicked him out. Some people are just beyond reason.

  • prettybunnys@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The biggest thing to me is that the Soviets congratulated us on it.

    The Soviet Union choosing to go along with the fake moon landing instead of calling the USA out is the absolute dumbest part of the whole thing.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, usually the Lizard people select world leaders from different clutches of eggs to ensure maximum competition and division among the human nations under them. Due to a malfunction in one of the incubators, Nixon’s egg hatched about seven years after Brezhnevs. During that time the same incubator hatched a separate clutch, among which Nixon was counted, which is why he was allowed to become the US president. Having not grown up together, they were still competitive, but little moments like the moon landing concession still occurred from time to time. Now that might sound unconvincing, but that’s only because I’m not an actual conspiracy theorist. I don’t have access to the deep lore and twisted logic therein.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Moon landing was staged, but Stanley Kubrick wanted to film on location.

    • deeves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay, here is what I believe:

      I believe landing on the moon and a live video broadcast from the moon are two extremely different things.

      I think they did have actors on a soundstage pantomime to the live audio being piped from the moon. Just cuts down on so many variables, and the stakes were too high for the broadcast to be a technical disaster.

      I think that even despite that, the moon landing is still one of the greatest achievements of humanity.

  • alt_xa_23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of the funniest conspiracy theories I’ve seen is that “flat earth” is a CIA psyop to make other conspiracies look bad by association. (This came from a moon landing truther)

    • flamingleg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      yes flat earthers are used by the social designers to ‘poison the well’. What’s so funny? it would be strange if they didn’t exploit (and cultivate) the immense stupidity of the median person. It makes the job of lying to them easier (and cheaper)

  • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You do not understand how disbelief works if you think this is effective or even relative.

    Yes, that does mean conspiracy theorists are fucking brainless morons.

    • Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Flat Earthers and anti-vaxxers really put into perspective the sorts of people the Scriptures talk about who are the same equivalent morons.

      That being, people who are often dumb enough to get themselves annihilated despite ALL the evidence and warnings sent.

  • strifegroove@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I watched the launch.

    America

    Why the fuck does your space agency shoot worse video of a historic event then a YouTube channel celebrating 100K subscribers.

    • Denjin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Cutting to the crowd at the moment of booster separation was peak live event directing.

      • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        My understanding was that it was a risky moment, they didn’t want to risk showing astronautes dying… But that doesn’t make sense since the same logic applies to most of the launch!

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        My headcanon backstory for whoever made that decision is that they got kicked out of the porn industry for only showing the guys’ faces

    • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can’t get into details but I worked at a company that does video broadcast equipment and worked with NASA helping them update some systems. It was mostly garbage equipment. The company I worked for is the harley davidson of broadcasting equipment; was good in the past but modern competitors are objectively better but the brand recognition is still there from the old days.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You try getting video from something that, within 30 minutes, accelerates to 18000 MPH. Literally, it will change what frequencies you even have to listen to, let alone the crazy amount of interference experienced during the process of exiting thr atmosphere.

      Literally, the air compressing and ignighting against the shell of the space craft itself will produce crazy signals, let alone every other effect.

      There is a reason it took even SpaceX over a decade to keep signals remotely intelligable with their booster recoveries, let alone launches aimed directly at the moon.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s true but it doesn’t explain the black screen at liftoff and cutting to spectators during the booster separation.

  • zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Looking at footage is among the weakest arguments against flat earth tbh

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Nobody: “I was unconvinced by eight crewed missions to the Moon, but if they do a ninth then I’ll have no choice but to accept all of them.”

  • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Does anyone know why the rocket needed to be “the most powerful” when it only got them out of Earths atmosphere? Is the crew module just that heavy that it needed it?

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Getting anything to the moon takes a lot of thrust.

      Also because of having less stages than Apollo, the core stage needed to be quite powerful to get the stack all the way from the surface to the outer edges of the atmosphere.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Partially, yeah. Crewed spacecraft by necessity weigh significantly more than uncrewed, because life support is very heavy. But they also want to take that very heavy spacecraft further away from Earth than any crewed spacecraft has ever been before, which means they need to take a lot of fuel; yes, it’s a gravity-assisted free-return trajectory, but it still needs fuel for course corrections and other orbital dynamics. Plus, it’s a two-stage spacecraft, while the Saturn V was three-stage, so it’s got to carry a lot more dead weight a lot further than before.

      All of that together means they needed the most powerful rocket ever. The lander mission will almost certainly be even more powerful than that, because while it won’t need to go as far, it’ll be carrying another spacecraft.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    They always had to build the massive rocket, hoax or not. And the catering costs…

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t even get me started. The worst part is that if the writers call for a disaster episode, they have to actually kill the actors, like in Apollo one. In all seriousness, the hoax conspiracy is especially unhinged, even as conspiracy theories go.

      • dustycups@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I like the one that says they had to spend all this money to make it realistic, then they made everything so well they said “fuck it, we may as well go for real”

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah there’s a trapdoor where they go to live underground for a month then they’re whisked away to shoot the ocean recovery scene

  • Prizefighter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    For April 1 I almost made a Flat Moon Society but I ended up playing Starfield and forgot about it. I wanted to see how far I could go with it.

  • Akh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I get the sentiment but they are not landing on the moon

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        tik taks

        As a middle-aged man who’s never used TikTok before, this is how I’m gonna refer to it from now on.