It’s funny.
You ask anyone who uses GenBS in their daily workflow and they all say “it’s really good for these ancillary tasks but not for my core role”.
Then you ask someone else who’s core role is those ancillary tasks and who’s ancillary tasks are person A’s core role and they will say the same thing.
Maybe they assume it has any use whatsoever because they only understand their core role and don’t understand their ancillary tasks
The exception are Lawyers and Advertisers. I think that this is because the average Lawyers core role is to generate BS and the majority of Advertising is completely pointless.
There are good lawyers and advertising workers out there; they are the ones who don’t use GenBS.
It’s funny. You ask anyone who uses GenBS in their daily workflow and they all say “it’s really good for these ancillary tasks but not for my core role”. Then you ask someone else who’s core role is those ancillary tasks and who’s ancillary tasks are person A’s core role and they will say the same thing.
Maybe they assume it has any use whatsoever because they only understand their core role and don’t understand their ancillary tasks
The exception are Lawyers and Advertisers. I think that this is because the average Lawyers core role is to generate BS and the majority of Advertising is completely pointless.
There are good lawyers and advertising workers out there; they are the ones who don’t use GenBS.
AI looks like it’s good for X…if aren’t familiar with or regularly do X.
Same old fuckin’ story of work devaluing. “Hurr i can do your job”