Why would a mathematician use j for imaginary numbers and why would engineer be mad at them?
I think it might be the wrong way around: Engineers like to use j for imaginary numbers because i is needed for current.
Mathematicians are taught to be elastic with notation, because they tend to be taught many different interpretations of the same theory.
On the other hand engineers use more strict and consistent notation, their classes have a more practical approach.
Using the same notation makes it faster to read and apply math, a more agile approach helps with learning new theories and approaches and with being creative.
I have no idea what they’re talking about, but I do love a happy ending.
I love how that wannabe 4chan nerd just got outnerded in the comment section
Can somebody ELI5 this for my troglodyte writer brain?
Integrals are an expression that basically has an opening symbol, and an operation that is written at the end of it that is used also as a closing symbol, looks kinda like:
{some function of x} dx
.The person basically said “the dx part can be written at the start also, and that would make my so mad :3”:
dx {some function of x}
.This gets their so mad because understandably this makes the notation non-standard and harder to read, also you’d have to use parentheses if the expression doesn’t just end at the function.
Note: dollar used instead of integral symbol
I also use dollars instead of integral symbols, I don’t do math though.
An integral is usually written like ∫ f(x) dx or alternatively as df(x)/dx. Please note that this is just a way to apply the operation ‘Integration’, like + applies the operation ‘Addition’. There is no real multiplication or division.
But sometimes you can take a shortcut and treat dx as a multiplied constant. This is technically not correct, but under the right circumstances lands you at the same solution as the proper way. This then looks like this ∫ f(y) dy/dx dx = ∫ f(y) dy
Another thing you can do is to move multiplicative constants from inside the Integral to in front of the Integral: ∫ 2f(x) dx = 2 ∫ f(x) dx. (That is always correct btw)
What anon did was combine those two things and basically write ∫ f(x) dx = dx ∫ f(x). Which is nonsensical, but given the above rules not easily disproven.
This is more or less the same tactic used by internet trolls just in a mathy way. Purposefully misinterpreting arguments and information, that cost the other party considerably more energy to discover and rebut. Hence the hate fuck.
Learned a new word, Hate ****
Hate ****
I too take hate shits on the toilet.
sado-mathochist
Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I’m EE gang, and all my homies use j.
That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I’ve never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.
Pikachu engineer
That’s a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.
OPs boyfriend is obviously an i engineer and hates j engineers. No one can stay angry at mathematicians - engineers on the other hand…
The fun starts when you study quaternions
i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1
This can’t be real
They’re actually very useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion
this isn’t real
[Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.
I think rather
d/dx
is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences ofx
in that expression. For example,dx²/dx
is best understood asd/dx (x²)
. The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.I just think of the definition of a derivative.
d
is just an infinitesimally small delta. Sody/dx
is literally justlim (∆ -> 0) ∆y/∆x
. which is the same aslim (x_1 -> x_0) [f(x_0) - f(x_1)] / [x_0 - x_1]
.Note:
∆ -> 0
isn’t standard notation. But writing∆x -> 0
requires another step of thinking:y = f(x)
therefore∆y = ∆f(x) = f(x + ∆x) - f(x)
so you only need∆x
approaching zero. But I prefer thinkingd = lim (∆ -> 0) ∆
.
As a physicist I can’t understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don’t fuck
As a software dude I can see you wrote a regex, I just can’t find out what you’re trying to match.
Pardon my denseness, but is this sarcasm? Since that is a TeX snippet.
Why would a RegEx start with a
?
Yeah, it is. I’m just working with what I have.
Heeyy… So when you need to express something more, well, delicate than just code, you need to use math symbols. For that you can use tex expressions. Modern markdown supports it: just copy and paste the $…$ part into any render engine
I’m scared. I think I’ll generate some backend spec to calm down.
Nooo… You should write spec and generate code, not the other way around
This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏
😏
NGL, this is hot.
I believe the correct terminology is denominator mathematician.
They both bottoms.
Physicist behavior
But physicists actually do that? They often write it like this: ∫ dx f(x) or this: ∫∫∫ dxdydz f(x,y,z)