There’s really not much to the article. It honestly reads like the journalist spotted a few disjoint statements/events in other publications with a common theme going slightly against the current narrative and wrote them down, but without doing any follow-up themselves. It’s just those snippets. If you keep up with AI news even tangentially, you probably have read 75% of the snippets already and saw this coming.
https://archive.ph/2PsPD
There’s really not much to the article. It honestly reads like the journalist spotted a few disjoint statements/events in other publications with a common theme going slightly against the current narrative and wrote them down, but without doing any follow-up themselves. It’s just those snippets. If you keep up with AI news even tangentially, you probably have read 75% of the snippets already and saw this coming.
So typical Axios stuff. Man they are a worthless org.