• WhiteQuasar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    is RISCV mature enough for desktop use? Are there chips based on RISCV that would at least be as good as a AMD/Intel or ARM chips?

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you like working in slow motion, yes, sure.

      Source : I have a Banana-Pi SBC https://www.banana-pi.org/en/banana-pi-sbcs/175.html and… it works, running Linux proper, with a desktop environment, which is in itself pretty cool IMHO but damn, you have to be patient. That being said “just” already being at that stage on economically affordable hardware is amazing. We are probably not far, say few years at most, with usable RISC-V chips for mundane tasks, e.g. text authoring, coding, Web browsing, but don’t expect compilation of a browser, Blender, or gaming on this for few more years. IMHO it will go fast because it’s catching up so the path is rather well laid down, which is much harder than innovating and pushing the envelope.

      • WhiteQuasar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wonder if the US is trying to slow down the development of RISCV in order to mantain egemony over chip production. I think RISCV poses a big “security” flaw for them being totally open source.