• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Maybe I’m just too cynical and tired of this shit, but it’s just an ad. It isn’t wholesome, in my opinion. It’s just to make people share their product, and they had to pay almost nothing to do it. They didn’t actually do anything for Attenborough. They just took advantage of his birthday to make an ad. Being really cynical, this was already a planned change, and they just picked an opportunity to maximize advertising opportunities.

    • Dzheyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I will not, and do not, disagree with anything you’ve said. But, I still maintain the sentiment of the act is wholesome. If it wasn’t lego doing it and it was some mom and pop shop that did I don’t think you’d be as cynical towards it. Or maybe you would. I don’t know your life internet stranger 🤷

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’d probably still recognize it as partially an ad, but a mom and pop shop isn’t spending tens or hundreds of millions on PR. There’s a chance that they actually cared. There’s basically no chance the leadership at Lego cared and made this happen. Potentially someone working in marketing did when they had this idea, but not the Lego company. It’s too big for that.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A little too cynical maybe.
      Doing a good thing for your own benefit doesn’t change the deed. Everyone does it, we aren’t selfless creatures by nature.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I just struggle to see this as doing a good thing. Do you think he cares? Who is this helping? I just see it as a cheap PR stunt that takes advantage of an old famous person’s birthday to get people to think of them instead of that other person.

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If Lego inserted themselves into the convo, I would agree.
          DA had posted the picture with Lego first, and they’ve responded with a simple gesture. PR stunt? Sure. Does it hurt anyone?

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Please don’t try to take this away from me. There aren’t many things to be hopefully about these day, and most everybody here recognizes this for what is is. But it’s a far cry from the rape cover up, murder, and war going on daily around the world right now. We all need a little bit of lightheartedness right now.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Fair enough. It is at least more fun than most of the other stuff we see.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I feel iran is making more watched lego content than anyone else, I don’t see the complaints about that

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        How is that relevant to this? No one was discussing that. Yes, that’s also advertising, but for Iran. I’m not saying it’s good, but at least it’s trying to say something, unlike this.