fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoWild Onesmander.xyzimagemessage-square83linkfedilinkarrow-up1598arrow-down124
arrow-up1574arrow-down1imageWild Onesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square83linkfedilink
minus-squareAllNewTypeFace@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42arrow-down1·1 day agoTextile moths do. Good thing that they’re drab looking.
minus-squareZagorath@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 hours agoBiologically speaking, there is no way to define butterfly in a way that includes everything people consider butterflies and does not also include moths.
minus-squarediabetic_porcupine@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·17 hours agoIf not butterfly why butterfly shape?
Textile moths do. Good thing that they’re drab looking.
Moths are not butterflies.
Biologically speaking, there is no way to define butterfly in a way that includes everything people consider butterflies and does not also include moths.
If not butterfly why butterfly shape?