• Tenderizer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We’ve seen as a result of this court ruling in favour of trans rights that Minns is calling for changes around prisons and sports. Then again in the UK we’re seeing a court ruling against trans rights do the same (although UK Labour, and especially health secretary Wes Streeting, are particularly vile human beings so that might not be a factor).

    Based on these two data points, we see trans rights regress when there is a highly publicized court ruling. Keeping matters of trans rights out of the domain of the courts seems like the best way to prevent this from happening.

    Enshrining the most important trans rights into law (bathrooms, healthcare, prisons, and general anti-discrimination protections) while leaving issues like gender segregated social activities up to the organizer’s discretion is the best way to protect trans rights.

    • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Fair enough, I agree with that. It’s disillusioning that the only way to be safe is to be invisible.

      • Tenderizer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        52 minutes ago

        It’s not so much being invisible as it is avoiding highly publicized debates between “women’s groups” and trans people. There are other, safer, spaces to be visible.