• TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    For me NSFW is something that can get me fired if somebody sees it on my screen during working hours or something that can put the consumer of the content at risk, like gore images making hemophobic people faint. I can see how this image can be a bit disturbing, but I don’t think a piece of leather should be censored, as it dilutes the meaning for the tag too much.

    I’d then click on something NSFW thinking there is just another piece of leather with feathers under the tag… I don’t think I need to explain this one.

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I mean yeah but Lemmy doesn’t have other tags that blur the image so we gotta make do. And if you pair the nsfw tag with a content warning like “CW: penguin skin” then nobody is confused as to what they’ll see if they unblur

      • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Systems built on unspoken rules break outside of isolated communities, considering this is very much a global community, I doubt such a system would work in the first place. Would be actually cool to have various degrees of warning tags to then choose on the client side what to unblur automatically and what not to, though.

        • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I’m not asking for a system, or a standard. I’m speaking to one person about one post and asking for compassion. Lemmy features would be cool, wider adoption of content warnings would be cool, but neither are what I’m asking for