I’m a solo dev and I got tired of not having a good iOS app to manage my self-hosted media stack, so I built one.

Quartermaster connects to Radarr, Sonarr, SABnzbd, NZBGet, qBittorrent, Jellyseerr, Overseerr, Jellyfin, Emby, Lidarr, Prowlarr and Bazarr. Manage your library, approve requests, watch your download queues, see active streams — from your phone.

The part I care about most: it’s pure client-side. No backend, no analytics, no accounts. Your server credentials are stored on-device in the iOS Secure Enclave and the app only ever talks to the servers you point it at. Nothing leaves your phone.

It’s in TestFlight beta now and I’m looking for testers — especially if you run qBittorrent or a less common setup. Free to test.

More detail and how to apply: https://qmstack.com/

Happy to answer anything about how it works.

  • swifty_lew@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Hey! Nope - this is not vibe coded - the app is not generic AI slop

    It is built as a 1st party Apple app

      • swifty_lew@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, I used AI to help build the site and write some of the copy, I’m a solo dev not a marketing team. The app itself is the part I’ve poured the work into. Fair cop on the site though

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I appreciate the candidness. Hopefully you can understand AI presentation generally implies an AI product, and without source code to audit, it raises some flags. Clarity of where AI is used as you’ve done here helps.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          The public site is the first impression and introduction of a product, and this one has all sorts of slop signs around it. You can see how that can make someone skeptical to the quality of application. I don’t agree “computers can do it better” - I’d prefer a plain old website that gets to the point over one showing useless graphics, generated text, and non-functional interactions.