The problem is also labeling LLMs, spicy autocompletion programs, as “Artificial Intelligence”.
There’s absolutely no intelligence in there. There’s no consciousness. It doesn’t think. It’s make to appear so. But it’s an illusion. It’s just probabilistic routines.
Slapping a shiny “AI” sticker on it doesn’t suddenly make it the real deal.
Just like those Hover Boards from a few years ago, that should really have been called Rover Boards instead, but the word “Hover” feels more futuristic.
So pushing for the Great Intelligence with current models, only the delusion is real.
LLM are based on transformer models, which are in turn based on ANNs. Research on ANNs is part of artificial intelligence. You don’t need to be conscious to solve a problem.
It’s just probabilistic routines
The same goes for your own brain. There is a lot to learn about it, but the consensus is that we can model much of our goal oriented behavior as reward seeking probabilistic agentes.
The problem is also labeling LLMs, spicy autocompletion programs, as “Artificial Intelligence”.
There’s absolutely no intelligence in there. There’s no consciousness. It doesn’t think. It’s make to appear so. But it’s an illusion. It’s just probabilistic routines.
Slapping a shiny “AI” sticker on it doesn’t suddenly make it the real deal.
Just like those Hover Boards from a few years ago, that should really have been called Rover Boards instead, but the word “Hover” feels more futuristic.
So pushing for the Great Intelligence with current models, only the delusion is real.
LLM are based on transformer models, which are in turn based on ANNs. Research on ANNs is part of artificial intelligence. You don’t need to be conscious to solve a problem.
The same goes for your own brain. There is a lot to learn about it, but the consensus is that we can model much of our goal oriented behavior as reward seeking probabilistic agentes.