• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes, we ignore it. Given the size of the universe, if being inside a black implies any conseqences that will ever hurt us, it will be a process that takes billions of years to develop, giving the human race billions of years to either become extinct or solve the problem.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      There is no problem introduced by noticing that there exists a horizon to the universe. It’s also in no way what so ever a new “discovery”, but a basic concept based on how horizons work in the first place.

      The only “new” “discovery” I’m aware of is just a theory about our galaxy being roughly in the center of a less dense area of the universe that’s ~ 2 billion lightyears across. There has been observational evidence for it for many years, but the new info correlates it with dark energy observations as well as distance/density observations, or thereabouts.

      • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        There’s that and what seems to be a preferred direction of spin on a galactic scale. But it’s not every galaxy.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yea, that’s definitely a detail that doesn’t jive with the homogeniety assumed of the universe for the Big Bang model, but a lack of perfect homogeniety doesn’t itself disprove the big bang, it just means the single assumption about the smoothness of space needs to be thrown out.