Licence is MIT / Apache, of course.

EDIT: of course the relicensing is the problem here. Alas we’re in an all-time low interest in Free and Open Source politics, ideologies, and organization so the Big Evil Corpos continue to do their thing, one cog per time.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The latest version of NTP is 15 years old, and implementations are expected to be compliant. There is no risk of embrace/extend/extinguish from licensing here.

    Open standards are better than copy-left licenses, IMO.

    • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      There is no risk of embrace/extend/extinguish

      99.999% sure the idea here is exactly that. They want a GPL free system.

    • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The money influences the standards and look at which licences the big pockets are pushing. Sometimes I can’t stand the naivety.