fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 23 days agoResourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square199linkfedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down119
arrow-up1353arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square199linkfedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·22 days agoBut image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
minus-squarerainwall@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoThose 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·22 days agoProduction is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.