• potustheplant@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Except that it’s not “linux” like an actual open source linux distro is. There is no parallel here.

    Also, a negative example shouldn’t make you go “oh I guess there’s no hope then, let’s embrace the death of ownership”.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Android IS an open source Linux distro.

      It’s all the software that’s added to Android that’s proprietary. Binary blobs for Qualcomm chips, Google Play services, etc.

    • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      34 minutes ago

      It’s the kernel. For starters, Linux is a kernel. I don’t understand your point, the people running the Linux ecosystem (the corpos injecting money in the infrastructure and participating in the governance through the Linux Foundation) don’t care about user ownership. NVIDIA is a bad collaborator but it’s still allowed to do the shit they do. As other nonfree contributors on drivers.

      But let’s suppose an open and universal implementation standard of ARM and modem drivers was enforced? We’d have hundreds of viable Linux phones already. The battle wouldn’t be pretty but the alternative would be the current shitty state of affairs.