• isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I liked a version of this (I believe) XKCD said once.

    A perfectly valid response to the question, “why is the sky blue?” is simply, “because air is blue.”

    Yes, you can give a lot of explanation about refractive index and Rayleigh scattering. But all this does is provide details of how light interacts with air. And the same reason anything is the color that it is is due to the way it reflects, transmits, or absorbs light. You’re citing real scientific principles, but you’re ultimately just explaining why air is blue.

    • bullsworth@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      It’s a very good relevant XKCD.

      The title text is more directly applicable: If you ask “why are leaves green?” the usual answer is “because they’re full of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll is green,” even though “why does chlorophyll scatter green light?” is a great question too.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      53 minutes ago

      But it’s an incomplete answer.

      “air is invisible at short distances, blue at longer distances, and takes on red green and orange at sunset” would be better

      • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        The same is true for all colors. Tell me the color of a single atom.

        Yes, air can be colors other than blue at unusual light conditions, like sunset. But the same is true for any material.

        You’re stuck on the urge to explain. You call “the air is blue” incomplete. But all answers are incomplete. When someone asks what color an object is, they mean under ordinary distances and conditions. Air is blue even in an ordinary room. It just takes miles worth of air for its slight blue color to be noticeable.