The census by definition is for people WHO LIVE in a country where it’s conducted, but apparently that’s not the case in Australia where they even make it mandatory for non-citizens (tourists) when they are only visitors (who DO NOT live in Australia in the first place), the logic doesn’t make any sense. Like if, a tourist should not be forced to do it since they hold a foreign passport and have no residential address in Australia.

  • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Self-own here guy. Honestly, if this is the best example of use of ABS data you can find, then the census is indeed a huge waste of money.

    You’re referencing an obscure line item in school funding:

    Rural School Size Adjustment Factor (Reference 4)

    This funding line supports small rural schools that require additional resources to reduce rural and urban school disparities.

    Not surprisingly, the amount of funding is calculated by enrolments, as I’ve been saying:

    Allocation = Primary enrolments × Primary per student rate + Secondary enrolments × Secondary per student rate

    The only use of ABS data is to determine whether a population centre is greater than 20,000 people:

    Outside provincial locations with more than 20,000 population, as defined by the ABS Urban Centres and Localities (UCL). Using ABS 2021, campuses in Geelong, Ballarat, Bendigo, Shepparton-Mooroopna, Warrnambool, Albury-Wodonga, Mildura, Traralgon, Bacchus Marsh, Ocean Grove-Barwon Heads and Torquay-Jan Juc are ineligible.

    This really is the antithesis of “census driven funding” that you’re trying to illustrate. They’re not counting 3 year olds, or newly weds, or nubile virgins.

    The classification of population centre sizes could easily be determined without the census.