The census by definition is for people WHO LIVE in a country where it’s conducted, but apparently that’s not the case in Australia where they even make it mandatory for non-citizens (tourists) when they are only visitors (who DO NOT live in Australia in the first place), the logic doesn’t make any sense. Like if, a tourist should not be forced to do it since they hold a foreign passport and have no residential address in Australia.


Self-own here guy. Honestly, if this is the best example of use of ABS data you can find, then the census is indeed a huge waste of money.
You’re referencing an obscure line item in school funding:
Not surprisingly, the amount of funding is calculated by enrolments, as I’ve been saying:
The only use of ABS data is to determine whether a population centre is greater than 20,000 people:
This really is the antithesis of “census driven funding” that you’re trying to illustrate. They’re not counting 3 year olds, or newly weds, or nubile virgins.
The classification of population centre sizes could easily be determined without the census.