• senseamidmadness@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It really is amazing how far back Linux reaches. Aren’t there a few distros with current support that will run on a 486?

    • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      iirc the Linux kernel dropped support for pre-Pentium x86 in the last few years, so any distro with 486 support now would be using an unmaintained kernel.

      I think if you want a maintained operating system for your 486 today, NetBSD is probably the thing to run.

      • senseamidmadness@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        https://ostechnix.com/linux-kernel-ends-486-support/

        I am surprised to learn it was May of last year, with the 6.15 kernel being the first to drop 486 support and the 386 family dropping out back in 2012.

        After a touch more research to figure out what the oldest currently-supported computers would be: I also hadn’t realized the first Pentium debuted in 1993. Pentium and compatibles are still operable, so there are maintained distros out there like Tiny Core Linux that will work on computers made 33 years ago. Just amazing.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Debian 12 is one of the last holdouts of 32-bit support if you’re like me and have some pretty old devices still kicking. Just a couple years left.

    Originally I was an advocate for dropping 32-bit support, but now that getting newer devices is increasingly unaffordable… I actually think it might be a good idea to reverse course on that just a little and keep 32-blt support for just a little longer. At least until after the AI bubble finally fucking pops.

    • darklamer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can wholeheartedly recommend NetBSD if you want rock solid and eternally dependable backward compatibility forever.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I started using 32 bit stuff after experiencing how they tend to be much lighter on memory. A 32 bit os can make a 2~4gb machine very usable. I even find myself thinking if changing everything to 64 bits was really necessary

      • Obin@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        There is the x32 ABI that tried to have that 64bit cake and eat it too, but it didn’t catch on, probably for good reasons. Gentoo still allows you to run it on modern hardware in case you want to try it out.

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are still distros that support 32-bit besides Debian 12, like Alpine and Void. Until when, that’s unknown.

    • Xyre@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      This was me, pulling out an old netbook trying to figure out which distro it could still run. 🫤

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I tried to re-use a phone for some command line stuff.

      There’s a lot of arm 32 stuff that’s not working, so it makes it much more difficult