because hes an apostate of thiel. hes slowly losing the spotlight to Flocks ceo,
Since the federal government is deeply corrupted, we have to rely on—get this—Florida, whose attorney general James Uthmeier filed for an emergency injunction against OpenAI, on the grounds that they cannot control their own products.
Good Florida Man.
OpenAI did not pay to subvert the paywall of the Times, at which point their data-scraping operation might be more easily detected. Instead, they developed a way to circumvent the paywall and avoid detection. And when Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s co-founder and president, was told about this maneuver, he replied, “ah nice.”
Nice. Can we publish this publicly, then?
Respect for the law could literally be written into the source code of a model: If OpenAI is aggressively downloading data from everywhere, the least they could do is drop in the U.S. Code (particularly the section tied to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) and train the model not to violate it.
Eh, idk. I read that these big US AI companies actually were respecting robots.txt and identifying with a well defined clear User-Agent. So they were easy to rate limit or block.
China-based IPs, however…
because americans love criminals
No, we don’t.
But the US isn’t controlled by Americans and the US isn’t democracy
I don’t think you can no-true-scotsman your way out of this. Those criminals in charge are Americans and half your voters wanted them.
They are mostly foreigners at the top.
Rich criminals. Fuck the guy getting 15 years for stealing bread.
Most of us don’t
but hey don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story
And yet most of you couldn’t even be arsed to take a step against a criminal convicted rapist to be elected as your president.
Sorry but that “most of us don’t” argument falls short when you don’t even do your basic civic duties to get rid of criminals.
Ok, Mr perfect with your diddling princes.
Why don’t you BREXIT this conversation?
I’m not even British you brain-dead moron.
You have used “arse” and “fuck ye” but whatever.
I’ve looked through your comments and we have more in common than not.
If you don’t understand that our government is occupied and we have been in a confirmed oligarchy for over a decade, then stop shitting on all Americans, please
Oh, so now my verbiage decides my nationality?
I don’t give a damn about your govt being occupied. You had a chance of NOT electing a confirmed kid diddler rapist racist piece of shit, but you didn’t because “Kamala won’t say Israel bad”. That’s on you, period.
I don’t know how one small group in Michigan complaining about Kamala means that ALL Americans elected Trump?
So your countries are helping. So… keep bitching. Fight their battles for them for free.
You just haven’t the slightest clue, huh? I remember grade school…
This shithouse argument again.
They’re right, and they know more than you think. Especially when 30% of your voter base prove it every election.
Fun fact, people voted. If all legally cast votes had been counted, Harris would have won with 285 electoral votes.
Voter suppression won, not Trump.
Neat, so you still went to work and acted like normal after you believed democracy was subverted
I haven’t done that in twenty years lol.
The other option is starving and then being shot by the most militarized police force in the world, while nothing actually changes.
They can’t achieve their goals if they kill their own workforce
True, but also you can’t do anything if you’re dead, and these fucks are not the most competent, but they are violent and willing to cut off their own nose to spite their face.
They would totally kill their own work force, thinking they could just replace them, until there’s no one left. And further, they have the guns and bodies to do it.
You’re not even making any sense. Just big talk from a small mind
What are you talking about? They are replacing their workforce with ai. Not that it’s really working out for them but they are deffo doing it.
Voter turnout was abysmal. 64.3%. Less than 2/3 of the country bothered to even vote.
Don’t tell me that people voted when a third of those with the right to vote didn’t bother to go and fill a fucking ballot.
You don’t seem to understand voter suppression.
The very article you quoted accounts for ~10 million votes.
The remaining 34% who didn’t vote is approximately 80 million people.
So we’re still at a point where 70 million where content with whatever happened. 70 million didn’t even bother to stand up and cast their votes.
(oh, and that’s not accounting for the shift the voter suppression would cause in the count of “eligible for voting” people).
And had even half those turned out, it would have been much harder to fix the vote result
You still don’t understand voter suppression
This is so confidently incorrect it’s hilarious
Yeah. It’s an excuse you use, like a few others
Ones you don’t afford countries that genuinely have voter suppression
It’s a question of liability.
OpenAI wants zero liability.
But clearly the answer is a non-zero value. I don’t see how they aren’t 100% liable when it’s their employees who execute the process.
They are starting and running their own machinery. The industry likes to pretend software is some intangible but as hardware prices have demonstrated, software is very much physical. And it’s not narrative, it’s instructive.
Large AI companies know their tools are dangerous, and are shouting it from rooftop.
Knowing that, they keep developing them, and ran agents with little supervision, insufficient sandboxing, and ended up attacking third parties.
I hope there’s liability.


