So for a long time pretty much every computer used the traditional like windows layout with moveable windows that minimized or maximized and had a taskbar and start menu and whatnot. You had some minor changes with Mac and stuff, but now you can really have some radically different ways to use a computer.

Personally I have differing preferences if I’m using a laptop or a desktop.

On my desktop I prefer a dock and to use the mouse to click around. More of the windows style. Then on a laptop (which I use most often) I use a heavily gesture based navigation.

Currently I have Gnome modified so that when I am in a program, like the web browser I’m in typing this, it is full screen. The top bar is hidden, and there’s no dock of any kind. Not even one that pops up when I move the mouse to the edge of the screen. Instead I have everything for navigation hidden inside the task view. I swipe up on the trackpad with 3 fingers to bring it up. That’s how I see time, battery life, and the other topbar stuff too. If switching quickly between two things I put one of them in a 2nd desktop and use a 3 finger side swipe to move back and forth.

I’m curious to know what other unique or highly custom navigation methods people are using on Linux. I know tiling window managers are pretty popular. Is there a general consensus on what’s best these days? Or is everyone doing slightly different things?

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    Tiling Window Manager, no bar, fullscreen terminal with btop on workspace 1, 40% split ortholinear keyboard, neovim, vimium in librewolf, vim in shell…vim keybindings everywhere.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I feel really lost with all these users talking about window managers, hotkeys and specific terms. I feel like a rookie😅

    If someone has a video comparing a lot of different workflows, I’d love to watch it. I feel like my workflow could still be improved.

    Currently I use Gnome on my Surface Go (hooked to a big screen) daily driver, Cosmic on my old MacBook Pro and KDE on my Steam Deck (hooked to the same big screen).

    I love Gnome and how I’ve configured (with an extension) every program to open on a specific workspace at startup while just using gestures or keyboard to move between workspaces.

    I’ve kind of reproduced this with KDE and Cosmic, but it’s not as perfect.

    KDE doesn’t follow the window rules I’m setting and Cosmic doesn’t let you automatically start programs on a specific workspace.

    • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You probably know a lot of the stuff just not the terms for it. If you are interested in like tiling or scrolling window managers you can look up videos on those terms and see them. The difference between them and a DE is that they are literally JUST a window manager. They don’t come with the other features of a DE. You basically won’t have a GUI unless you build one out. This gets you into the realm of like Linux ricing. Where people spend tons of effort and time making their computers look and function in a unique way.

      • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        Yeah I guess I should do this in order to learn more about window managers and hotkeys.

        Still I know that I need a DE for sure for now. Even on a DE, I find the explanations about how to use them kind of lacking.

        For instance, Gnome doesn’t tell you that you can spread 7 programs on 7 workspaces if I’m not mistaken.

        At the beginning, I was really using a kind of Windows workflow instead of discovering the full power of Gnome…

        This applies to the other DEs I use too…

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago
    • GUI - on SailfishOS phone
    • TUI - on PDA / Linux handheld with physical keyboard
    • Manual tiling WM on Laptop and PC - current order of preference StumpWM, GNOME PaperWM, i3 / sway.
  • AstroLightz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    KDE for me with floating windows. For certain things, I’ll use s terminal, but most of my navigation is through KDE and some keybinds I set up on a keypad.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Ever since I tried tiling window managers, I can’t go back to traditional style of handling windows anymore. Nowadays I’m on KDE, but I use extensions to automatically tile every window I open and close. Single applications are stretched to fullscreen, and every opened up window would then scale the applications to half screen and so on. There are different logics and algorithms (known as layouts) how this can work. Multi virtual desktops are a must with this philosophy, when opening and grouping multiple applications. In general automatic tiling (with manual intervention and rules for specific windows) does have its own problems sometimes.

    Recently, and I mean since yesterday, I changed the philosophy to a different philosophy. I’m currently on an endless tiler, where windows are opened up and can be scrolled from left to right on the screen. The most prominent of these type of window managers would be Niri, but I use an extension on KDE to emulate this behavior.

    • rescue_toaster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      What do you think of niri? I think i’m of a similar mind. I switched to i3 10ish years ago, and could never go back to a floating WM. Now on sway and am perfectly content with my workflow. I’m curious to try out niri, but haven’t really been that motivated to try it.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        First, two days ago there there was a post that might interest you (BTW I still don’t get how to link properly in Lemmy): https://lemmy.ml/post/53788147 - Opinions on Niri (and scrollable window managers)?

        I always found Niri intriguing. But never tried this type of window managing, because two reasons: a) if windows are layed out out of my view, I still have to scroll or search otherwise, so it is it really a win against floating windows? At least this was my thought process, and b) the automatic tiling is in my flesh and blood, not sure how this would affect me as my thinking and every operation is hard wired to it. But tiling of windows comes with their own problems as you know.

        Opening a window that is basically fullscreen or its own size without getting tiled, has its pros. I don’t use Niri, but the KDE extension “Karousel” works pretty well so far. I can still float single window or put them in a stack, or tile (up and bottom part of a group), and I still have my multiple desktops. So it’s a bit weird at the moment, but maybe just need time to get used to it and to rewire some of my brain. It’s too early to talk about experience and what issues could popup. This is my current situation and thoughts about the Niri concept (just not Niri directly).

  • fatur.new@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I changed my taskbar to be like the one in Haiku OS because I don’t like long taskbar.

    Not even one that pops up when I move the mouse to the edge of the screen.

    how do you do that?

  • NekoBeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’ve tried a window manager once and now can’t go back. It’s to a point where I start using my Linux keybinds on my Windows laptop at work.

    I tried KDE and Gnome but those weren’t really for me. I did like the polished end-to-end experience you get with those desktop environments though.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I was tiling window manager user too (mainly qtile), nowadays I’m on KDE using extensions to emulate those tiling features. Krohnkite is pretty good, once setup with all the keys and other optional stuff like removing window titles and so on. Recently even switch to a Niri like extension, called Karousel, but this one doesn’t support multi monitors. So I end up getting the KDE set with a tiling experience.

      COSMIC will have a builtin support for tiling too, with a seamless integration. So maybe this could be something you explore too.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Well, i guess there’s a misinderstanding about what a wm is (a stacking one, like Gnome, KDE, XFCE, is also one just like a tiling one like i3) so i was not sure if you’re a bot. No offense intended.

          • OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            People typically distinguish between “window managers” which are usually pretty barebones and “desktop environments” like Gnome and KDE. Also Gnome’s and KDE aren’t actually the window managers, Mutter and KWin are (respectively)

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    On laptop, full tiling like i3/sway. I hate inserting a mouse to use a laptop, which tiling lets me avoid.

    On desktop, tiling’s good but doesn’t really feel like a requirement. Something like COSMIC where you can choose between both works better.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Back in the days when I used a laptop, I would have really needed tiling window managers. Wish I knew this in 2010 or so.

  • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Manual tiling/placement and focus with a full sized keyboard, giving me one-key-combo focus of any window on the screen, and exact placement/sizing. Unfortunately most window managers and compositors lack support for this. Tiling WMs are stubbornly self-arranging or only support swapping windows, which they’ll later rearrange.

  • starblursd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Currently using niri with title bars hidden on main PC hotkeys to navigate and gnome on the TV pc with the hide top bar extension and dash to dock both on intelligent hide… Hotkeys snap to side and drag to resize

    • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It seems that hotkeys are very popular. I’ve got a few custom ones for media controls (shift+[ or ] for skip/go back, and insert for play/pause) How many different hotkeys are we talking?

      • starblursd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A good bit… To be honest, there’s too many for me to remember other than the ones that I frequently use. I pretty much just use the default Niri config keybinds and then added a few of my own and changed a couple to preference

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Using Waybar I have a detailed clock and a sound widget on bottom right corner of my screen, and left of that is space for “systray” icons.

    My windows have a title bar, that show the icon and title, and a close button.

    No task bar or other navigation elements on the screen or the windows.

    I make heavy use of Alt+Drag actions for resizing moving windows around and constantly have windows rolled up so only the title bar is showing. I never minimize windows and rarely use fullscreen.

    For accessing applications in a convenient way I use the root menu on desktop rightclick and the client menu on middleclick.

    The whole setup is fully customized and built from ground up to be as least annoying and intrusive as possible.

    This is basically my setup since ca. 15-20 years now. Started with Openbox on Debian and since 2008 Arch Linux, and around 2-3 years ago I switched over to labwc on Wayland which allowed me to re-create what I used on Openbox.

    • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You seem to have a ton of screen real estate to work with. Is your monitor really big? I feel like using a small laptop influences what I do a lot since I’m trying to maximize my screen space.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        My desktop computer monitor is a 28 inch 4K screen, so yes, it is on the upper end of the median screen size, I guess. I ran Hyprland on my laptop (13 inch 1080p) for some time but I like my environment harmonized, so I use the same configuration there, too.

        For easier management I make use of labwc’s areas and snapping feature to have windows proportionally the same size on both screens. The areas use percentages by default, which makes it quite easy. I have top, bottom, left, and right, the four corner quarters and two different center regions.

        On my laptop I usually only use the center region for the browser.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I really like the terminal, most of my use is a web browser or terminal with tmux.

    I use hot keys like cray, but I haven’t found a tiling window manager I like yet (I don’t like when things shift automaticallly, it breaks my mental model), and I haven’t found a Linux desktop with the keyboard ergonomics of macOS.

    But 95% of my time is with full screen terminals, so I’m actually pretty okay. I have customized vim and tmux to the hilt, and I like that.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I seriously learned how to use computers on Windows XP, so any computer I set up for myself, I set up to be as similar to Windows XP as possible.