• ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s the amount they paid employees, so they paid all of that. Unless you mean just the non c level employees, if be surprised if the c suite is more than a quarter of total comp though.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The lede

        The vast majority of that money isn’t actually landing in employees’ bank accounts

        Further down

        The largest share, $1.1 billion, came from Anthropic’s stock-based compensation expenses, which reflect the value of company shares employees earn as part of their pay. Anthropic records that value as an expense even though employees don’t receive the equivalent amount in cash.

        It’s fake money.

        • chisel@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Eh, stock comp is real comp. They can’t sell it at the moment, but if the $2T IPO is anywhere near a success, they’ll make absolute bank.

          More companies, especially startups, should do stock based comp. It gives the employees a vested interest in the conpany and a share in the success. When the owners cash out, the employees get at least a small windfall too. Normally, the employees just get a worse work environment.

          • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            My point is that the cost of stocks is an accounting cost like interdepartmental services (eg billing the cost of the owned building based on headcount), not “real” in terms of inflow/outflow (sales of service turning into employee pay.)

      • Antagnostic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, mostly the latter. I was being facetious to make the point that any company that sees success makes it the norm to not reward those that made it possible which I would like see a change in doing so.