The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women’s Association takes legal action against Kmart to come clean about whether its suppliers are connected to Uyghur forced labour.
“Kmart markets itself as an ethical business, but two of its suppliers have been linked to Xinjiang in China, where the mass internment, repression and forced labour of Uyghur people is rife,” the rights group says in a statement.
This case is the first of its kind in seeking to bring real accountability home to Australian retailers about the risk of Uyghur forced labour in their supply chains.
This is an important step in making Kmart back up its words with actions when it comes to its ethical sourcing claims.
This case also highlights the weaknesses in Australia’s modern slavery laws. It shouldn’t be left to members of the public to compel companies to open their books through legal action where there are suspicions of links to modern slavery.
[…]
Oh shit. I didn’t think Kmart used sweatshops (and thought price rises were in part due to more ethical practices) but guess I’m naive.
Guess I’m going back to op shops
Be careful some places like Savers aren’t op shops but Americans shops who sell donated goods for their own profit.
Others like Salvos use the money to push Christian hate on society.
tries to search for ethical consumption under capitalism
walks around pantsless
The irony is I can sew but the materials are low quality and quite expensive
We could go back to wearing leaves over our privates?
🍁
Which are unfortunately full of Kmart fear fashion, often at more expensive prices than Kmart…
I know :(
I prefer to buy items like socks and underwear new as well. I wonder if Cotton On is better for budget basics. The prices aren’t as low but that means nothing about ethics these days
I really don’t know… they all are participating in capitalism with global supply chains… so hard to disentangle.
That’s fun :(