• CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    ITT: People who looked at some random headline, didn’t bother looking further and assumed they knew everything.

    It’s a stupid headline. These tanks, are to directly affect air polution/quality in urban areas. Trees are terrible at that. The microalgae is 10-50x more effective in cleaning the air.

    They aren’t going to rip out trees for these. It would have taken you 10 seconds to find the source of the image and the article from 3 years ago to find out, the social media post was misleading. You spent more time making incorrect and wild accusations.

    • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Even with the misleading headline, has nobody commenting about how bad it is ever seen how many trees die when set up in low light conditions? These can be used in places trees wouldn’t be effective, and that’s before the whole “they’re better at cleaning the air” bit.

  • Redredme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can we please, stop reposting this same shit pic for the last, I dunno, year?

    This is the gazillionth time. I get it. Is a stupid algea tank. where a simple tree does the same for a fraction of the cost. It’s of no use in the public space except as a tech demo or art object.

    So. Yeah… Next?

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is only the second time I’ve seen it, but please… there was a time when complaining about reposts was the most often repeated thing I saw on reddit. Can we not have that bit of irony become a thing here?

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    While I don’t want to spoil the joke (but I will) and I hate techno-optimist solutions that displace actual solutions for our biosphere as much as the next person: supposedly, Belgrade is such a dense concrete hell that trees aren’t viable solution (at least in the short term).

    There is some rumbling that liquid trees are not the solution to the real problems caused by large-scale deforestation, nor does it reduce erosion or enrich the soil. However, much of this wrath is misplaced as Liquid tree designers say that it was not made as a replacement for trees but was designed to work in areas where growing trees would be non-viable. Initiatives like Trillion Trees are laudable, but there is something to be said for the true utility of this tiny bioreactor. The fact that they can capture useful amounts of carbon dioxide from day one is another benefit for them. Such bioreactors are expected to become widespread in urban areas around the world as the planet battles rising carbon levels in the atmosphere.

    Source

    • tostiman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They can thrive in tap water and can withstand temperature extremes.

      So maybe they can be used in regions that are too hot for trees, like desert cities