• Cattail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t you have to conjugate the ket? Like I don’t think braket is dot multiplication

    • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The current administration has removed all genders from science, so all verb stems are now uninflected in the quantum tense, sorry.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You can extend the dot product to imaginary fields, there are a couple of standard extractions. If I remember correctly (but my quantum physics background is really poor, so I’m ready to be proven wrong) the one compatible with the bra-ket notation is

        a dot b := sum_i conj(a)_i b_i