RSS Bot@lemmy.bestiver.seMB to Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.seEnglish · 20 days agoReplacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo serverdisco.cloudexternal-linkmessage-square3linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkReplacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo serverdisco.cloudRSS Bot@lemmy.bestiver.seMB to Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.seEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square3linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·20 days ago The team also took on responsibility for server monitoring, security updates, and handling any infrastructure issues themselves - operational overhead that Heroku had previously covered. This can easily be a not-insignificant thing to manage.
minus-squareEvotech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-220 days agoYeah, 300 bucks a month seems like a seal for your team not to manage that at all Edit I see it’s 3000. Might be worth it then
minus-squareJakenVeina@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoTrue, but giving less care and dilligence to these concerns makes sense for an internal staging environment, as opposed to a production environment.
This can easily be a not-insignificant thing to manage.
Yeah, 300 bucks a month seems like a seal for your team not to manage that at all
Edit I see it’s 3000. Might be worth it then
True, but giving less care and dilligence to these concerns makes sense for an internal staging environment, as opposed to a production environment.