Account I use to comment

  • 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2024

help-circle
  • I always thought that leaving a conversation unfinished was a rude thing. What I was trying to find (as I have previously said) is how much a cat would have to weigh to collapse into a blackhole (assuming the cat when curled up would resemble a sphere with a radius of 15 cm). Last thing, how is “a more common problem” any helpful? I appreciate you trying to help but it feels like telling somebody, who is drowning, that breathing air instead of water would prevent drowning. Again, thank you for trying to be helpful.


  • Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzScientific explanation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Alright mate, you and I seem to be having a major problem with communication. I am not trying to see how much I would have to squeeze a normal cat to form a blackhole, I am trying to see how much a cat would have to weigh to form a blackhole as it curled up. And an equation can be used to find any component of said equation as long it is the only one missing, so there is no one thing I “have to do”. I am really feeling like you’re disrespecting me here.





  • uh it should be in kgs sorry, I was just bewildered how I managed to fuck up an equation with it literally being in front of me (cus I googled it). The number comes up to a little less than 2 protons… which means (according to my food poisoned brain’s calculation) that if there were 2 protons in a sphere with a radius of 15 cm, it would collapse into a black hole.


  • I tried to calculate how much this kitty would have to weigh to make a blackhole and… I found 3.13*(e)^(-27). Society is so fucking lucky I didn’t decide to study math

    Edit: my painkillers finally kicked in and I redid my calculation: Assuming the cat as a sphere with 15 cm radius, the cat would have to weigh 1.00994318 e26 kg which isn’t as glaringly wrong as my previous calculation. (omg I wrote e^-27 whats wrong with me)


  • Education-wise it is best to have an “uninteresting” cadaver to start with. Otherwise one might spend half a lesson trying to figure out something beyond their scope. But after grasping the basics it is best to delve into such variations, otherwise one might learn them mid-surgery. For research it is best to have the test subject be as “normal” as possible (unless the research is about the variation), so the findings are not skewed.