Very cool, I always have difficulty soldering on USB-C connectors. Does this have any major drawbacks?

How can we make governments think long term again? All they care about is winning the next election and that means giving the biggest tax cuts by slashing the most budgets.

I’m actually not surprised this is possible. The thumbnail might just be a bad raw image of unrelated or unfiltered data. The UWB spectrum can be used for radar purposes to an absurd accuracy. We’re talking sub-mm measurements. Bringing this to the wifi spectrum seems within the realms of possibility as the frequency is pretty similar. The difference is UWB radar is typically used in close quarters with a fixed radar where as the wifi source is probably further away or moving on a mobile phone or wearable.

Okay sure, for a specific use case yes you can point a record to a private IP, however this explicitly doesn’t expose your homelab to the web. I misunderstood OPs intention.

You can’t point to 192.168.X.X that’s your local network IP address. You need to point to your public IP address which you can find by just searching ‘what is my IP’. Note that you can’t be behind CGNAT for this, and either need a static IP or dynamic DNS configuration. Be aware of the risks involved exposing your home server to the internet in this manner.

Beyond the obvious CGT and negative gearing loop hole, we really need to look at zoning. Developers continue to buy up land in the furthest suburbs and subdividing it into low density residential (with government approval). Our zoning regulations are completely bizarre and we need to start ending the dichotomy of big land far away vs apartment closer in, so that we can have cheap apartments further out. It’s wild to be that they aren’t massively developing the regions at the end of metro lines to encourage outbound commutes and building high density residential in these areas as well.