That’s not how it works - the original author of the input owns the copyright for the work and if the output of the LLM is the same or a close derivative, the that copyright will be infringed. The ruling only means that YOU can not claim copyright for something that LLM spit out and you put your name on.
That’s not how it works - the original author of the input owns the copyright for the work and if the output of the LLM is the same or a close derivative, the that copyright will be infringed. The ruling only means that YOU can not claim copyright for something that LLM spit out and you put your name on.