dusk

No idea, I was surprised that they were able to get social media to comply with their censoring the young from information bs, since Australia is such a small market.

“Livestreaming US execution would breach prohibition of torture, UN rights office warns” https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/10/1168565

Every nation should be doing whatever they can to block access to this, and should also be opposing the usa’s choice to be even sicker f*cks than they normally are.

Serious question? Or trolling?

Remove access is not the same as remove content

Being a pedant is not the same as making a valid point.

This is hopefully a 1 time ‘event’, blocking access to this would have an immediate effect, the issue would be that once this is online, there will be multiple ways in future to view it, and sick f*cks who wish to do so.

A decent government would still oppose this, and would attempt to block access to it.

The Australian government was able to remove access to social media for under 16’s to ‘protect them’, so why aren’t they able to remove access to live streamed murder?

The majority of governments are at least partially at the mercy of the usa government in this respect though, easily one of the most absurd, and corrupt governments on the planet.

Didn’t every single option in that ‘vote’ include using ai though?

And didn’t they all seem like very deliberately long winded options, designed knowing that the majority of users would only read the titles?

Also fuck_ai@lemmy.world

and antiaialliance@lemmy.blahaj.zone (maybe ignore this one though)

It was a successful/cheap way of attracting views/likes, that also increased ltt’s screwdriver sales. It was transparent, and lacked integrity. The screwdriver itself was just a lightly reworked screwdriver form a different brand, with ltt branding, and a $69 price tag. Tools for fools.

Project Farm did it worse (and more successfully), he reached a result that didn’t place the ltt screwdriver in 1st place, so he removed one of his own criteria to change the final ranking… and was applauded for doing so.

8 butt is probably more my style

The manual, section 1:

Jeff never made sense to me, his videos seemed dodgy, the first one I saw he was jumping on the linus screwdriver silly hype train, but his fans just adored him, to the point I assumed some of them were drooling. I didn’t see much more of him over the years, so my view is definitely limited.

That is a very sad, and twisted irony considering the ‘morality’ of the people behind ai

After glancing at the manual, I now know I was previously correct stopping at the home page

I haven’t managed to get past their home page yet, it just looks like an inside joke.

Weird little guys is an interesting read, I was surprised to find Jeff Geerling there, I always thought he was just a really crappy youtuber, with really stupid fans. I was half expecting to find Linus SebastiDouche on the list afterwards.

Some links to anti-ai digital things:

https://noai.starlightnet.work/list.html

https://codeberg.org/brib/slopfree-software-index

https://www.newinlinux.com/ai-free-linux-distros-open-source-operating-systems/

https://noailist.org/

f-droid repository: https://izzyondroid.org/docs/general/AppInclusionPolicy/#ai-policy

“How did you react to Debian’s decision?”

I deleted it, debian was thankfully not my main, just a backup/something of interest.

The ‘vote’ itself seemed dodgy, every option was going to ai in some form, or another.