Unless text is removed to add the picture, nobody loses anything by adding additional tools that help some people.

I’m kinda surprised how willing this court is to burn its own credibility for small inconveniences to the Trump regime. I expected them to sell out the rule of law at some point, but I figured they’d do it for something big, with a maximum show of courtly gravitas. This is just clumsy and obvious.

Maybe the Amish were on to something.

I always read the article and this is no exception. Do you have anything to add to the conversation besides snarky assumptions?

I suppose when the author says AI they mean LLMs. The machine learning models that, say, interpret mammograms don’t have nearly the same issues, and I’d hate to see them all thrown on the pyre together.