• Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    The 500w have only been legal briefly due to a loophole. They were never meant to be so

    Got a source on that? All NSW’s pages describing the law, which presumably had to be specifically written describing the intent of the law, said 500 W.

    a 500w bike won’t do what I need

    What is it that you need? If you can make a good case I might be convinced. So far, nothing I’ve thought of fits the bill, since 500 W + a bit of leg power is enough to be able to get up hills while carrying heavy loads, as far as I can tell.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        What’s “some reason”? I’m primarily concerned with letting people get about their cities to go places. To get to work or school, to do their shopping, to ride the kids to their cricket club, etc. With cycling for its own sake, I am far less concerned about making ebikes relevant. Whether that’s mountain, road, or gravel biking.

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          I don’t know what reason they could possibly have, tbh.

          I imagine that car drivers see the people on bikes and scooters, and just get mad.

          They’ll say it is for safety or whatever, and I do think people on bikes and scooters underestimate how scary it feels to be a pedestrian and have a bike pass by closely, but if you keep asking questions, it seems like they just want cars to predominate and are threatened by non-cars.