• Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The very point of the removal of protection is as an attack on trans women. So unless you were suggesting an impact on cis women too, I don’t understand why you would add “and women” when they were already at the centre of the discussion.

        Your current wording implies that the term trans folk does not include women.

          • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The wording is important.

            The conversation was about trans women already. If your point is that it impacts not only trans women, but all women, then say that! Don’t frame it as if women and trans people are non overlapping groups.