• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 days ago

    This has been done too much, I’d like to see a campaign to ban sodium chloride instead.

  • SW42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    100% of people consuming it have died. Eventually. That stuff is dangerous!

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      False. I have consumed it and haven’t died.

      I might in the future, but haven’t died as of today.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No they can’t, at least not in general. The longest lived, easiest to date, life has been trees, but there’s no suggestion that they’ll survive climate change

        Most trees have live spans in the low hundreds of years

        • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is no definitive proof either way. Fact is that they can live a long, long time. The oldest known trees are close to 5000 years old. There’s even a clonal system estimated to be 80.000 years old. https://www.bbcearth.com/news/can-trees-really-live-forever

          Fact is that a tree is much more likely to die from external factors than from old age. It cannot be proven, but it is certainly not impossible that (some) trees are immortal under the right circumstances.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            We have an eco system in southern Australia that at the moment is eucalyptus trees. They take over all at once after a fire, and they live about 300 years. When they die off rainforest trees and undergrowth take over, until there’s a dry period and fire

  • Setarkus.MX@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    The author of the petition is really looking out for others by not using the unlucky number in the list and taking care of souls for centuries even after their body’s gone

    by signing this petition, the undersigned agrees and acknowledges that the creator of this petition has legal ownership of my soul for the remainder of my natural life plus 1000 years.

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 days ago

    Everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is water, they’re not going to ban it. What we need to ban is hydric acid, that’s the most dangerous chemical in the world.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Most drowning victims lost their lifes in this stuff! It’s dangerous at fuck.

    Also one hydrogen is already volatile, just imagine what two of them do!

  • ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ever since high school chemistry, I’ve wondered if it would be more correct to refer to it as hydrogen hydroxide. Yes? No?

  • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dihydrohen monoxide gave me dihydrohen monoxide tainted pee and my girlfriend died when she drank my pee.