• mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      😅

      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.

      This is in Europe mate. London to be precise. Not the US. People don’t casually carry guns around here.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Things can change.

        Didn’t used to be robot murder cars on the road either.

        Maybe crossbows, aim at the tires? Sorry: tyres.

        Maybe some kind of light that is extremely bright in a particular wavelength, that blinds their cameras and sends them into an emergency halt mode?

        But anyway lol, sawed off shotguns are extremely illegal in all the US as well… I guess the analogy was lost in translation =P

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          High powered lasers that can burn a hole in the sensor aren’t too hard to get ahold of. A sticker slapped over one could probably work just as well though, and there’s more plausible deniability.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            … I was thinking more like an IR/UV floodlight, than a laser.

            Less chance of accidentally blinding someone.

            Granted, you’d have to figure out a frequency range that would be ‘super effective’ against particular cameras, but… I would feel bad about accidentally giving someone a non consensual amateur lasik surgery.