fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 16 hours agoThere was an attempt at scale.mander.xyzimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1508arrow-down18
arrow-up1500arrow-down1imageThere was an attempt at scale.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square53linkfedilink
minus-squarepotoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 hours agoI get that, but I personally think 60,000,000 tiny buffalo would be more impactful. Can someone do a quick edit in Photoshop?
minus-squareBalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 hours agoThere’s not even 60,000,000 pixels in that image.
minus-squarecrimsonpoodle@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoWe just need dithering with different levels of grey representing a different amount of Bison, arranged so that the macro pattern still registers as a Bison; but in fact it would be a mega Bison.
I get that, but I personally think 60,000,000 tiny buffalo would be more impactful. Can someone do a quick edit in Photoshop?
There’s not even 60,000,000 pixels in that image.
We just need dithering with different levels of grey representing a different amount of Bison, arranged so that the macro pattern still registers as a Bison; but in fact it would be a mega Bison.