• LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t understand this argument.

    I paid once many years ago. I’ve never been asked to pay again. Why would I switch before they make a change?

    In the meantime, jellyfin is getting better and better. Plex will probably be dead to me at some point, and when that happens, I’ll hop over.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, this is it. When they ask me for more money, or when they demand I host on their servers, I will adios. Until then, I paid $75 one time and the service does exactly what I want it to do, and it’s ezpz for a basic individual myself.

      I think the most likely scenario is the company goes under because they didn’t have enough money, and then folks will come here and complain about that. Maybe I’ll be one of them, but I’ll try to remember I paid $75 more than 10 years ago, and so I think I’ve more than gotten my money’s worth.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Currently, they’ve been content to get more money out of you without asking you, so you’re right so far, but only if you consider your advertising details and personal information to be valueless.

        They’re expanding data collection and showing more ads as a matter of course for years now. When they can no longer get money from other companies because of you, they’ll switch to nickel and diming you.

        I find that it helps to think of transactions in a more reductive way, like bartering + money. I am trading X amount of money, Y amount if privacy, and Z amount of hassle for whatever service or product. Even though Y and Z are hard to quantify, they are real things with real value, so not considering them at all is surely worse for me, and what they’re counting on.

        I have found that nearly every mainstream online service I might be interested in presents a negative value proposition when calculated like I described, but everyone values their privacy and time differently, so your mileage will, of course, vary.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, that’s really overthinking things. I host my movies and shows, I watch them from wherever. I feel like I’m not going to spend more time analyzing it, because my usage of the app is literally finding my movie and watching it, or putting it on for my kids. If my junk email gets more junk emails, so be it. I personally lost the privacy battle a million years ago, although I guess I do my best by not having Facebook or Instagram or anything of that ilk. I do exist, and so I’m fucked anyway, but I’m not going to spend energy that somehow doesn’t get me a meaningful return on that energy spent.

          • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It may be applying more thought to it than you are willing to do, or be regarding things you don’t consider important or valuable, but very many people value those things and find them worthy of consideration.

            To “overthink” something is to expend more time and energy making a decision than can be objectively gained from making the “best” decision vs. the others. Your decision to not consider the non-monetary costs is your own and your prerogative, but it has no bearing on the objective value of your personal privacy.

            You’ve decided not to participate in the privacy battle and so have lost much of it without a fight, which is understandable. Its a hard, thankless battle without end against powerful foes, requiring vigilance and continually gaining knowledge. I think it is fair not to fault people for giving up, but passively encouraging others to give up, too, is working for they enemy you’ve surrendered to.

            Its OK to let people choose their own priorities and pick their own battles, especially if it isn’t hurting anyone and entirely within their own lives like this issue is. People fighting for causes that you aren’t fighting for, but still benefit from, is a public good. Someone defending their own privacy is done for their own good, but helps you, too. See “do not track”, adblockers, the EFF, and countless other consumer protections as examples.

            • tko@tkohhh.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 minutes ago

              I appreciate you putting it this way. There IS a battle happening to be sure.

              Unfortunately, it feels like the battle that’s being fought is between former Plex users and current (continuing) Plex users. It’s frustrating as a continuing Plex user to feel like we are making all of the Jellyfin users angry just by existing. Some of us feel like explaining why our choice is rational, but that is often met with more hostility.

              My hope is that we all (as self-hosters) can recognize that we all have different priorities and those priorities will lead to different choices. It’s not wrong to leave Plex for something else. It’s also not wrong to keep using Plex if it suits your needs.

              (to be clear, I’m not at all implying that you were being hostile. This is just a general impression I get from several self-hosting communities when it comes to Plex versus other options)

    • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m in this same boat. Right now jellyfin just isn’t close enough.

      I was at a buddies house last week, he uses jellyfin. We were having weird decoding issues, pink/purple flashes that looked like HDMI desync.

      Resetting/reseating etc etc anything on the TV did nothing. Had to restart his server then it was magically fine 🤔

      I’m fine dealing with that kind of stuff occasionally, but my family is not capable.

    • MrPistachios@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Plus you can easily run them side by side. I setup jellyfin a while back when Plex used to charge users for streaming on mobile but now they don’t if the server owner has a Plex pass.

      For me Plex is still a lot simpler to manage if you have a lot of users, and if users have their own servers they share with you

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Charging for certain services is one thing. That’s not what drove the last Plex exosdus.

      Most people take umbrage at Plex offering features for free, saying they’ll never be paid features, and then removing them as options for free accounts and effectively paywalling them.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They became dead to me much sooner then you. Once they knew what I was watching I left.

    • ForgottenUsername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Same brought mine almost 8 years ago, and have never had to pay them a cent more.

      Overall not a bad investment.

      And plex just looks nicer and offers a better experience.

      If it changes I’ll consider migrating but for the moment Plex had done right by thier lifetime pass members

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        That hasn’t been my experience. They unilaterally changed their TOS repeatedly after I was already subscribed to a lifetime agreement. Even if they made the terms better, that’s still bogus, as contracts of adhesion are ethically dubious in general. This is economics, not Calvinball.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      That’s pretty much where I’m at too.

      Both Jellyfin and Plex are pretty great currently, I prefer Plex slightly, but if Plex becomes worse then I’ll likely make the switch over to Jellyfin. I’ve liked Jellyfin for years but Plex has still been my main app.

      I have both of them installed anyway.

      Plex is less confusing to use if you want to share your library, but thankfully I don’t have any concerns about that because I’m selfish with my media and just have it set up for my own personal use.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        *when Plex becomes worse

        I am not aware of any company that has reversed course on enshittification once it has begun, so Plex seems certain to follow that path. I would consider at least being prepared.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I am not aware of any company that has reversed course on enshittification once it has begun

          It happens when they’re punished for it in the market. Microsoft finally realized they’re bleeding Windows and Xbox users, so they’ve got major initiatives to improve both. Unity tried to make the worst business pivot I’ve ever heard of, and their customers were very clearly and vocally jumping ship in response, so they undid that pivot. Plex’s only competition is an alternative that doesn’t have a business model, so if they bleed enough users to Jellyfin, they’ll either reverse course or stop just shy of some threshold where people leave Plex; or their business will die, which is also an option on the table.

          • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 minutes ago

            Hose are called “trial balloons”. They announce a feature they know will be wildly unpopular to gauge the severity of the backlash, then temporarily reverse course while running a massive public outreach campaign to draw as much attention as possible to their feel-good response to the public: “we hear you and respect your opinions”, etc.

            Then, when the buzz dies down, they re-implement those same things slowly and quietly. In some of your examples, their responses are literally nothing more than words in print; no actual actions have been taken that align with their announcements.

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              Unity somewhat fits that description, but it was definitely net negative for their business, and with how long it took them to walk back from it, I don’t think they had any plans to walk back before the backlash. Microsoft has been slowly making Windows worse for a long, long time; it wasn’t something they did all at once and then issued a “we hear you”. They are legitimately scared of losing their market dominance right now.