• mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I didn’t realize they shot multiple models at once. I had assumed they had one model that they shot multiple times and composited together. I suppose you save time this way, at the cost of making the shot a little trickier to make sure the support of the front X-Wing doesn’t obscure the ones behind it.

    • SSTF@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      I wonder if it has to do with ease of compositing multiple models. If you have three X-Wing models in the same shot you can have one in focus, with the others a little blurry and if the front one passes in front of the others perhaps it makes the compositing easier since instead of cutting two models separately and trying to make them look correct as they pass in front of the camera, you just cut them out together.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Back then it was probably a lot easier to make more models, and the quality would be better with a single shot. Some of the original footage has blocky areas where the merging wasn’t perfect. Didn’t matter back then, it was far better than most anything else, but three model shots plus a background would have been ugly. Original Star Trek footage also has some of that.

      Or to put it another way, we couldn’t have faked the Moon footage because the technology to fake it wasn’t created yet. It was easier to just build a big rocket and go.

      • Tujio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well, the government hired Stanley Kubrik to fake the moon landing. Problem is, he was such a damn perfectionist that he demanded that they shoot on location.