Aberystwyth University closed one of its campuses a few years ago. The place has been left to rot, but recently they’ve started clearing the place out, and removing all the old scientific textbooks. Most of them look untouched. Wonder how much this lot would have set students back if buying new.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Depending on what exactly they are, these books may be practically worthless. I recently looked into selling some of my old college textbooks (that were $50-100 each at purchase), and they currently list online for <$5 each. Old editions are of no use to current students, and there’s no demand for previous editions (while there’s a good deal of supply).

    • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s mostly to do with testing questions changing every year, and nothing else. Which is gross and reason 8114 that academic publishing companies should have their boards vivisected.

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well training books for a specific examen get less relevant every 3 years or so as testing condition slightly evolve even if pass exams aren’t.

      • fireweed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It really depends on the subject; mathematics for instance probably isn’t going to change much decade to decade, but psychology is changing constantly.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          mathematics for instance probably isn’t going to change much decade to decade,

          JFC that’s wrong.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Their tactic is to change the homework questions and reorder some stuff every year so they can force everyone to buy new textbooks.

          The actual content changes very little.

          Some professors will just copy the new questions and hand them out so kids can get used books.

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            The amazing profs will include practice question lists for multiple editions, but that’s a lot of work.

            The good ones stick to one edition of the book for a number of years, so that you can buy used books.

            • FundMECFS@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              The best profs provide a pdf of questions and don’t expect you to buy a book 😅.

              • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                I’ve never assigned a textbook. It’s the wrong way to teach science because no scientists consult textbooks.

                Textbooks are about universities in a racket with publishers to sell books in their campus stores. Publishers don’t even pay authors on most textbooks.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Genetics: my professor was the text author. He said that the information in chapter [let’s pretend it’s # 27] was bleeding edge when he wrote it six months prior to publishing, but it was out of date by the time it published and was very out of date now, a year later.

          He gave us all his notes on the current version of the chapter and told us about the research coming in a few weeks that up render his new chapter obsolete so don’t study too close.

          I can’t imagine publishing an up to date genetics text

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      When I was selling my books one semester, the bookstore (which kindly repurchased texts in good condition) offered me a coupon for half off a mediocre pizza. For all my books that semester.

      I did not take the coupon

    • fruitcantfly@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m guessing that the big books are old collections of scientific journals. Depending on the journal, you could have multiple of those tomes per year. These days scientists access journals digitally, so there’s little benefit to keeping the physical copies around in most cases

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Came here to say this. Most of these books are probably superseded by newer versions and/or already archived. Also, if these books have spent a lifetime untouched in a university, how useful are they, really?

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah but these might come in handy in the future, when all you’ll find will be the 2+2=5, 0% woke editions