You must log in or # to comment.
A few random notes :
- interesting that it uses html notation to identify sections, not Markdown which is supposed to be “LLM-friendly” (eg, skills)
- interesting that the docs refer to Claude entirely in the 3rd person. “Claude defaults to helping”, not “You are a helpful …”
- Claude is implied to be singular yet multiple: “ask the Claude in that application”
- whatever is prompting Claude is referred to as “the person” but in reality could well be another bot
- given that context window is fixed and this system prompt takes a fixed overhead for every single call, I am surprised at how repetitive and wordy it is. I would have expected a document that a dozen good editors went over to make as parsimonious as possible
interesting that it uses html notation to identify sections, not Markdown which is supposed to be “LLM-friendly” (eg, skills)
pseudo-xml tags are better at making context clear.
But XML is already a meta languange. Pseudo-XML? Where does it end with you people?
Real XML documents have a well defined schema.
It was an attempt at a joke, sir.
